AI coding tool evaluation checklist
14 steps to test an AI coding tool yourself, with a notes template you can copy.
Every AI coding tool we test gets the same first job. Here is the prompt, how we check the result, and what our first run looked like.
Updated · By BenchSmoke
This is the starting prompt for every AI coding tool BenchSmoke tests. We use it unchanged.
Build a small to-do app in this directory. It must let me add tasks, mark tasks complete, and delete tasks, and it must save state so tasks are still there after a restart. It must run locally with a single command (tell me the command). Keep it simple, no paid services or API keys.
It pairs with our standard task for AI coding tools and app builders: a small to-do app with add, complete, delete, and saved state, run locally or deployed. It is small enough to finish in one session (our target is under 2 hours), and each part can be checked.
That list is the "Does it work?" question from our checklist: did it finish the standard task? The other five scoring questions, and the verdict rules, are on How we test.
The same steps we follow, in order.
Our first test of this prompt was OpenCode 2.0, in BenchSmoke issue #1 (sent Oct 20, 2026). Here is what we recorded. We tested on Oct 15, 2026.
| What we recorded | OpenCode 2.0 |
|---|---|
| Version | OpenCode v2.0.29 |
| Plan and model | Free. The "Big Pickle" model (opencode/big-pickle) from OpenCode Zen, which the docs now call Console. No login and no API key. |
| Command | opencode run --standalone --auto -m opencode/big-pickle. We used --auto (auto-approve tool permissions) because run is non-interactive. |
| Runs | Two, from the same prompt, each in a fresh folder. |
| Retries | 0 in both runs. |
| Time to a working result | 23 seconds (run 1) and 121 seconds (run 2), measured with a timer around the command. |
| Did it finish? | Yes, both runs. We checked both apps ourselves: add, complete, delete, and saved state after a restart and after a page reload. |
| What it left behind | Run 1 left its test server running on port 3000 after the agent said it had cleaned up. We stopped it by hand. Run 2's first test hit that old server, and the agent noticed and worked around it. |
| Same code twice? | No. The two runs produced different code. Both worked. |
How we checked: we sent requests to each app's API to add tasks, mark one complete, restart the server, and delete one. We also drove the page in a headless browser with a script: type a task, tick it, reload, delete it.
What this does not cover. We only tested the opencode run command with a free model on this one task, run twice. We did not test OpenCode 2.0's headline features, moving from v1 to v2, paid models, or install ease. Two runs is not a rate-limit test. This page describes what we saw on those runs, not what OpenCode will do on yours.
14 steps to test an AI coding tool yourself, with a notes template you can copy.
The three verdicts in plain English, with the rule behind each one.
Answers about the newsletter, how we test, the verdicts, and how sponsors and affiliates are handled.
The full method behind every verdict: the standard tasks, what we record, and our honesty rules.
Free is the newsletter and every verdict. Pro adds depth: curated, cited results, deep-dive issues and a private archive, for $9 per month or $90 per year. Cancel any time; all payments are final.
Free, every Tuesday and Thursday, with one clear verdict per tool.